Measured product lead custody receipt.
ECG With Every Beat Encoded
ECG-only staged codec · ZPE-Bio · PyPI zpe-bio v0.2.1 · github.com/Zer0pa/ZPE-Bio
ZPE-Bio compresses heart-rhythm recordings and publishes the replay error on every dataset it touches. On MIT-BIH, all 48 records return inside the 2.32% clinical target with a mean replay error of 1.12%.
PTB-XL processes cleanly but one record drifts to 5.29%, so the wider ECG surface is named, not claimed. This is a developer-ready archival codec, not a clinical device, wearable, or regulatory product.

ECG codecs that report file size without naming their replay error leave clinicians guessing.
Every replayed ECG should carry its measured change.
Lossless compressors preserve bytes and report file-size ratios. They tell a cardiology archive nothing about how closely a replayed waveform tracks the original signal on any named clinical corpus.
ZPE-Bio reports replay error directly per dataset. On MIT-BIH, 48 of 48 records return at mean 1.12%, inside the 2.32% clinical target a cardiology archive can show its review board. PTB-XL processes 100 of 100 records with full integrity but a worst-case record reaches 5.29%, so that corpus is named openly as out of contract rather than buried.
Replay error reported per corpus, with MIT-BIH as the reference.
Python and Rust replay ECG; the surface returns consistently.
Repo CI runs Python and Rust round-trips on every push across MIT-BIH, NSTDB, the European ST-T Database, and PTB-XL. Replay error is reported per dataset. MIT-BIH sits inside the 2.32% target at a mean of 1.12%.
PTB-XL logs 100 of 100 records with full integrity, but the worst-case replay error reaches 5.29% and stays visible in the public results. PyPI 0.2.1 is stale and is not presented as fresh; the surface is ECG-only.
PTB-XL processes 100 of 100 records, but the worst-case replay error reaches 5.29%, outside the 2.32% MIT-BIH target. PyPI is stale at zpe-bio 0.2.1. Wearable-data scope and the 0x0400 marker policy are open. No clinical, regulatory, EEG, wearable, or raw-size superiority claim.
FIVE PATHS FROM ONE clinical contract.
The hinge is the disclosed boundary, not the passed contract. A codec that names its worst-case excursion alongside its pass rate becomes the substrate cardiology archives can adopt before regulatory engagement — because the open question is already on the table, not waiting in the field.